Code · Workflow

Cursor (IDE-first)

AI inside the editor, not in a chat tab or terminal

If you'd rather see the diff as you go than read a terminal log, Cursor is the answer. Cmd-K for inline edits, agent mode for multi-file changes, and the editor stays the source of truth. CodeRabbit reviews the PR exactly the same as the recommended stack.

CODEBUILDERBEGINNERBeginnerFrom $0/mo
The stack
Cursor
Plan + write + iterate

Cmd-K for surgical edits, Cmd-L for chat with file context, Composer (agent mode) for multi-file work. The whole loop happens where you read code, so the review-as-you-write cadence is faster than CLI agents.

Free Hobby · $20/mo Pro · $40/seat BusinessAlts: Claude Code, Codex
CodeRabbit
Automated PR review

Cursor's own Bugbot covers some of the same ground but only inside the editor. CodeRabbit lives on the PR, where teammates see it. Keep CodeRabbit for the PR review even if Bugbot is on inside Cursor.

Free for OSS · $12/mo per dev ProAlts: Claude
Real monthly cost
small
$0/mo
Solo OSS, Hobby tier
  • cursorFree Hobby
  • coderabbitFree (OSS)
medium
$32/mo
Indie dev, daily PRs
  • cursor$20 Pro
  • coderabbit$12/dev
heavy
$260/mo
5-dev team, Business plan
  • cursor$200 (5x $40 Business)
  • coderabbit$60 (5 devs)
Workflow
  1. 1
    Plan in Cursor's chat panelCursor

    Cmd-L. Add the ticket and the most-relevant 2 to 3 files via @-mentions. Get the plan there; you stay in the editor.

    Prompt · Scope a change inside Cursor (Cmd-L)
    Plan a small, well-scoped PR for the change below. Don't write the code yet.
    
    Ticket / problem:
    """
    {{paste ticket}}
    """
    
    I've @-mentioned the most relevant files. Use them as the source of truth for current behavior.
    
    Output:
    1. Restated problem in 2 sentences.
    2. Files to touch + 1-line "why" each.
    3. Smallest viable diff in 5 to 8 bullets.
    4. Edge cases (3 to 5).
    5. What I should NOT change.
    
    Ask 1 to 2 clarifying questions if the ticket is genuinely ambiguous.
  2. 2
    Implement with ComposerCursor

    Switch to agent mode (Composer). Hand it the plan + the files. Cursor proposes a multi-file diff inline; accept or reject hunks visually.

  3. 3
    Inline iterate with Cmd-KCursor

    For tight edits inside one file, skip the agent — Cmd-K is faster. The editor stays in flow.

  4. 4
    Open the PRCodeRabbit

    Push the branch. CodeRabbit posts its review the same way it does for the other variants.

  5. 5
    Patch findings inlineCursor

    Pull the CodeRabbit comment into Cursor's chat panel via the GitHub side-panel integration; let Composer turn it into a patch you can review hunk-by-hunk.

What it produced
Frontend-heavy team, comparison week

On UI work, the IDE-first loop won: changes are visual, the editor is where you naturally iterate. On backend refactors that span 10+ files, the team preferred Claude Code because Composer's hunk-by-hunk acceptance got tedious. Mixed-mode users tended to keep both subscriptions active.

Common pitfalls
Composer's tab cost on big diffs

On a 12-file diff, accepting hunks one at a time in the editor takes longer than reading a CLI agent's summary. Pick the right surface for the size of the change.

Bugbot vs CodeRabbit confusion

Bugbot lives in the IDE; CodeRabbit lives on the PR. Don't disable CodeRabbit because Bugbot caught something — they reach different audiences (you vs your reviewer).

Other ways to do Ship code with AI
Curated by @alex-w
Updated weekly · last refresh: just now